Friday, October 28, 2016

Barack Obama's Plan B is in operation

Well our illustrious Potus had to resort to Plan "B" 11 days prior to the November 2016 election. Why...? Well, it was looking like Donald J Trump might actually have a chance to win and since President Obama wanted to leave nothing to chance, he changed from Plan "A" to Plan "B".

What was Plan "A" you might ask? That was to wait until the election had finished and having Kill...err...Hillary Clinton win and prior to being sworn in, Loretta Lynch (via commands from above)  would order James Comey of the FBI to recommend indictment on the Clinton Foundation investigation. Mr. Obama did not want to be implicated in the email scandal but he did want to leave the woman unable to perform duties as President of the US thereby giving him the opportunity to serve a third term in spite of the Constitutional ban on such a situation.

Mr. Trump was seen tightening the race. With Wikileaks adding negative reporting on the Clintons thereby weakening her attempt to win while simultaneously increasing his odds for presidential election. Enter Plan "B"...which was timed to occur too close to the election date for the Democrats to be able offer an alternative candidate (Perhaps Pocahontas, I mean Lizzie Warren?). Additionally, early votes had already been cast for Ms. Clinton leaving those votes lost to the Democratic Party. The election would proceed as scheduled and before the winner, no matter who that may be, could be sworn in; The president would declare martial law (if needed) and void the election results stating, if Hillary wins, she would not be able serve due to her indictment. Therefore. being the active Potus, he'd have to serve her term or the country would be left without a leader ignoring the Constitutional Progression which would leave a Republican as Potus (the Speaker of the House Paul Ryan). If The Donald won he would still proclaim the election results null and void due to an unfair election edge that was provided to the GOP candidate by the FBI reopening her email investigation so close the Election Date. He would have his lawyers pronounce this action, caused by Congressional Republican pressure on the FBI director, an Unconstitutional effort to influence the election outcome. The result would be the same as Plan "A". To be able to save himself from testifying in the email scandal, he would probably cite Executive privilege.

The only loser in this election will be the American People.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Analyzing Hillary Clinton's Acceptance Speech and continuing falsehoods

Before we can discuss  Hillary Clinton's
DNC acceptance speech, here's a YouTube video that contains her entire oration if you need to jog your memory or if, like Bill Clinton, you may have nodded off and missed some of it. If you don't need to refresh your memory or if you are finished brushing up on it, let's start with a fact checking of Hillary's speech
   Next up is an excerpt of the House query of FBI Director James Comey on the Clinton email investigation. This clip contains questioning by Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC)

Now judge for yourself, in the answers supplied by Mrs. Clinton, if she was truthful in her interview Sunday July 31st by Chris Wallace on his FOX News Sunday show:  
Let's change gears now and talk about the Lame Stream Media. When Donald Trump says something about a Gold Star Family, it is reported on and talked about ad Nauseum, but you never hear about Hillary Clinton basically calling Sean Smith's mother and the families of the rest of the Benghazi four liars. Listen to more from FOX News Sunday:
   This is where I need to point out the differences between Hillary's lies to Gold Star family members and Trump's response to Khizr Khan's speech at the Democratic convention. First we need to look Khan's speech featured below:

Here's a summary video of  Mr. Trump's response and further condemnation from Democrats and Clinton.

Before I go on it might help people to better understand the man, Khizr Khan. Checking out this website should provide some clarity. I might add that although Mr. Khan suffered tremendously by his courageous son's death, a father does not necessarily share views with his offspring (a prime example is Benjamin Franklin and his son William).

Now, let's see how Hillary Clinton treats Gold Star families. Keep in mind she voted for the Iraq war that killed Capt. Humayun Khan,

Then you need to see Hillary Clinton's sparring with  the Benghazi families:
Now we need to point out a few differences between Donald Trump's views and Hillary Clinton's actual record:
  1.  Donald Trump has only talked about restricting refugees from entering the US, so I fail to see the relevance of Mr. Khan's Constitutional question. The Constitution does cover all legal residents, not just citizens, living in America; but it does NOT provide coverage for persons seeking entry into the USA.
  2. Mr. Trump had NOTHING to do with the Iraq war so why was he singled out by Khan?
  3. Hillary Clinton did vote for the Iraq war, so shouldn't Mr. Khan take exception to  her rather than with Donald Trump?
  4. Hillary Clinton had EVERTHING to do with the Libyan war that left the country in shambles allowing Al-Qaeda, and subsequently ISIS, to control their government.
  5. Hillary Clinton also had the diplomatic staff at he CIA annex in Benghazi...Why? The US embassy is in Tripoli NOT Benghazi.
  6. The following probably outlines why the Benghazi location was used, keeping the embassy out of proceedings, and why all security requests were denied lest attention be drawn to Hillary's gun running operation.
  7. Donald J Trump has been mercilessly attacked, by both sides of the aisle, for his comments about stopping Muslim refugees from entering our nation until a proper vetting procedure can be established.
  8. Barack Obama's administration has already allowed over 2000 Syrian refugees into our county, without any vetting at all, with 2500 more to join them. DHS director Jeh Johnson has declared all Syrians, no matter their legality of entry, Sanctuary under the 2012 TPS (Temporary Protected Status). As an aside, no one has ever lost their "temporary" status. This protection means anyone covered can obtain a green card and permanent residency...even though they may be Jihadists. The application of this status must be changed to include approval of congress and Potus. The DHS Secretary should not have unfettered access.
  9. Not satisfied with Obama's number of un-vetted Syrians 5800 plus 2500 new arrivals), Hillary proposes to cover 65,000 a year additional Syrians under TPS
I was almost ready to post this rant when I found this little goodie that illustrates the zombie-like morons, including Warren Buffet (seated on her right; screen left), who support Hillary Clinton...

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Are voters really that stupid?

I can understand why the Bernie Sanders'  supporters are so incensed over the Wikileaks email scandal but there were slights to more than just Sanders. What about the rest of the nation, regardless of party, not demonstrating against the "Lame Stream Media" for colluding with the Clinton campaign to shut out Bernie Sanders? Why are Latinos not rebelling against the DNC for hypocritically refering to them as "Taco Bowls"? No wonder Debbie Wassermann Schultz was booed by her own states' (Florida) delegates. Now to distract the Democratic Zombie-like voters, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) is
pushing a wildly,  laughable theory that Russian hackers (this maybe true) were responsible for the leaked emails to help enable a Donald Trump victory (this is doo-doo)! What the F**k are they smoking over there in Obama La-La-Land...Tijuana Gold? Why on God's earth would the Russians want Donald J Trump President of the United States?  Wouldn't a Socialist like Sanders be easier to work with than the "Bellicose" Trump,  as the media have dubbed him? Wasn't it the gullible, easy to mold Hillary Clinton the one who proposed the Russian Reset Button?  I can't imagine anyone easier for Vladimir Putin to be able to handle than  "Crooked", living by her own rules, Hillary Clinton? Hasn't she already "Enriched" the Russians by supplying them with American Uranium while she was Secretary of State? (Notice that the link I provided is from the New York Times. Not exactly a staunch bastion of Conservatism.)  The Clinton campaign should be worried if indeed it were the Russians who hacked the DNC because if that were the case, Moscow had been reading the Democrats' emails for a few years (at least as far back as Clinton's stint in the Obama cabinet).

When Donald J. Trump jokingly suggested, if it was Russia, maybe they could supply us with the 30,000 emails of Hillary Clinton the FBI couldn't find. The Far Left Liberal News Media tried to bury Trump under a pile of caca saying he was "Asking Russia" to hack the DNC. Obviously the Lame Stream media has no sense of humor when it comes to Republicans. These Obama Lap Dogs must really underestimate the intelligence of the American voter (I would have said American Citizen since Constitutionally, only citizens can vote, but that would leave out all the Illegal Aliens in our country who do vote because Progressives, like the Clintons and Obamas, won't permit voter ID check...Even when FREELY provided.) If Russia or China or Iran or North Korea et al. had hacked the DNC, they could only provide the Deleted emails if they performed this hacking while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Obviously, if our enemies had the ability to hack the DNC, they would have preferred to obtain data from the easier to access private server of Hillary Clinton. After all, Secretary of State email would be more valuable data for them than the lame-brained DNC documents. Which leads us to another pitfall facing the DNC, as well as Hillary. That problem is if the DNC server, which employs a more powerful, robust anti-hacking software, can be breached, how more easily could a home email server, like Hillary used, be plundered?

Saturday, July 23, 2016

Why Donald Trump need to be our next Potus

Why should America elect Donald J Trump President of our country this November? There are many reasons but first let me shed light  on one of the most important one for Conservatives, regardless of their party affiliation. That is the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court. Many have said they are not sure of Mr. Trump's conservative credentials. To these critics I say maybe that's true, although I take him at his word that he's looking for conservatives to replace the late Justice Scalia, but just contemplate the choices Hillary Clinton would be considering. Not only should we be concerned with the Scalia replacement, but also the possible openings due to the ages of Ruth Bader Ginsberg (83), Anthony Kennedy (79) and Stephen Breyer (77).
Coupled with Clinton's  Lies, corruption and incompetence (especially her handling of classified information) her Supreme Court Nomination(s) would lead to the complete destruction of the USA as a democratic Republic. We already possess an Executive branch of government that treats itself empirically and a congress that is totally ineffective and useless. The ruination of the Supreme Court would leave Americans with no branch of government representing them. As an aside, to the Trump detractors, I'd like to point out the depleted condition of our Armed Forces under Barack Obama. A Clinton administration would only be a third term for him. I shudder to think of the possibility of Hillary Clinton, President of the United States, working claw in claw with Barack Obama, Secretary-General  of the United Nations...Agenda 21 on steroids.

My next reason for explaining why Mr. Trump should become President Trump fits within the realm of National Security. This is an area that progressives, like Hillary, don't care about the results of their actions if the "ends justify the means". That end is to acquire more voters to swell the rolls of the "Democratic" Party. With such power gained by their bloated, zombie like voting blocs, no Conservative would ever hold sway in the USA again. No Republican or Independent could ever aspire to the country's lowest political position let alone its highest. Donald Trump is the only presidential candidate to ever earn the endorsement of the Border Patrol Agents Union. Not just for building walls and encouraging immigration law enforcement, but also for common sense practices such as restricting admission from enemy countries and by non-vetted asylum seekers. Donald J Trump has also pledged to strengthen our military and stop the insane attacks on our Police forces.  My biggest hope, in this area, is that we would return to, what Liberals have dubbed our old "Draconian", Immigration policies including quotas, restrictions on certain countries and the restoration of Ellis Island(s) for immigration points of access. We used to deny entry access based on a person's health as my maternal Grandmother, who entered via Ellis Island, told me. This may be over the top, but we should at least agree that if we cannot properly vet immigrants they should not be allowed to enter our country.

My final reason for needing The Donald for Potus is my desire to remove money as the primary tool in use for gaining an election win. Mr. Trump has proved that the most money spent is not the deciding factor for winning, but rather the opinion I have long held, and the Clinton campaign only reinforces my belief  that not only do Presidential Elections have strings attached to them, due to money donated, but also gives the impression that the position of Potus is bought, not elected. Of course, Hillary Clinton has no choice but to spend vast sums of money on negative ads condemning Donald Trump in order to win. That's because she has no "Good" record of her own to promote by advertising. What I really don't understand are the rabid supporters she seems to command. Getting away with crimes, bad judgment and lies is nothing compared to her hypocrisy in telling these zombies she'll "make the wealthy pay"  really? In her mind "wealthy" doesn't apply to her $100 million dollars. You can hardly blame her for feeling that way since everyone seems to give her a pass on everything. After all, she is part of the select, elitist company of the ruling class. What's this woman's next  atrocious, egotistical plan? If she has her way, it would be rewriting the Christian Religion.

Friday, July 15, 2016

I Smell a Rat

Something is rotten in Washington, DC and it's not a case decaying fish. I truly believe FBI Director James Comey when he asserted the FBI Investigation was not politically conducted. However, can someone please tell me why Comey did not see fit to investigate Hillary Clinton's testimony, under oath, given to Congress October, 2015 when his findings directly contradict parts of that sworn testimony? Why were GOP Representatives forced to formally request a perjury investigation of Clinton's testimony when it fell under the purview of the FBI email investigation? And what about this gag order placed upon FBI agents to not disclose any information about her case?

Lest anyone think I'm only picking on the Democrats, let us also examine what some Republican "Trump Haters" are attempting to promote. They want to "Unbind" delegates, so I guess this is another case of "government knows best" or maybe just another case of attempting to retain a political "Status Quo". If these empirical reasons for a single digit approval rating succeed, we will no longer live in a true "Democratic Republic" , but rather an oligarchy comprised of the privileged and powerful few (aka Bill and Hillary Clinton, Judges of the Supreme Court, Labor Union Officials, Democratic People's Republic of Korea etc.) Seems like the GOP is trying to activate a system to crown their choice just like all the Barack Hussein Obama bootlickers have been asking to establish.

My last smelly item concerns the myriad of shootings being touted by the progressive gun grabbers in our government (Progressivism is wide spread in the Democratic party but Republicans have their fair share as well). Of course we know that they, and the lame stream media, habitually emphasize only those shootings which would perpetuate their particular ideologues (the previous link references Obama's gun laws by executive fiat). One of the Emperor's "decrees" states a ban on Military style firearms. If the Liberals definition is applied by the gun control fanatics, a Ruger model 10/22 (a .22 rim fire cartridge) would be banned. To understand the significance of this, in Florida's Everglades, where deer hunting is permitted,  no one is allowed to shoot deer with this weapon (check out the fourth bullet point under Prohibited methods and equipment for taking resident game in the previous link) due to the lack of killing power in a ,22 rim fire cartridge. In late 1944, the M2 carbine (a select fire version of the M1 carbine) was produced and, in some circles, was considered an assault weapon while the M1 carbine could not do to the lack of a selective fire switch and a smaller capacity magazine (15 rounds vs 30 rounds). Worthy to note that even the M1 carbine would be banned under Obama's edicts since the magazine capacity is more than 10 rounds. Why all this gun talk under I smell a rat? Because the abhorrent Dallas Police shootings were performed by a US Army veteran (remember; the DHS warring concerning veterans ) of non-Muslim affiliation with an "assault weapon" performed this dastardly deed while the Black Lives Matter group were peacefully demonstrating. What did our storied Potus dwell upon? Gun  laws and the perfectly understandable motives of Black Lives Matter. Even if all the preceding were based in fact, does Mr. Obama not remember the insightful rhetoric of this "Peaceful organization"? Maybe I'm too cynical, but I know the mantra of progressivism is "the ends justify the means"; and considering the use of explosives to rid Texas streets of this vermin, nothing was left to question the Progressive's assertions..

I'll stop my rant here before I truly piss off those wielding the power, but I can only hope you, the reader, will get my drift and fill in the blanks for yourself. After all, this RACIST black man (Not the contradiction of terms our government wants you to believe) had no intention of killing himself like a good terrorist would. Nuff said.

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Bill & Hillary's Blackmail Scheme

OK, here's how I see it. Bill Clinton's meeting with AG Loretta Lynch was just a gentle reminder from the Clinton's that if indicted, Hillary will implicate Barack Obama and all in his Administration by calling them as witnesses and asking, under oath, if they knew her servers were unsecure. In other words Blackmail. Then,  when Lynch answered questions about said meeting, claiming all she and Bill talked about was golf and grandchildren, she said she fully expected to follow the FBI's recommendation. Of course that would leave her wiggle room to not follow their recommendation in case FBI Director James Comey (who has a

 history where the Clinton's are concerned) double-crossed her and would recommend an indictment. Make no mistake, Comey did not lie about telling his bosses of his determination, they told him. Do you honestly believe our President would stump for Hillary Clinton if he even thought there might be an indictment? If you do, you are more gullible than the Hilarious...err...I mean "Hillary" supporters. But chin up all you truth seekers, the Clintons  

still have an indictment to elude. The FBI is still investigating their Clinton Foundation "Charity" and if James Comey is upset with all the crap surrounding the e-mail scandal handling, he can rectify the situation with an indictment of the Clintons that they cannot blackmail their way around. If this man is the stalwart apolitical investigator everyone claims, he would leap at the chance. 

Monday, July 4, 2016

Hillary Clinton and the FBI

OK, says the Lame Stream Media, so what if Bill Clinton waited on an airport tarmac for half an hour to speak privately aboard a public jet whose only occupant was
Loretta Lynch for thirty minutes. According to both, all that was discussed was G&G (Golf & Grandchildren). Let's forgot for now that Mrs.
Hargrove (nee Lynch) was appointed as a Federal Judge In 1999; she was nominated by then President, Bill Clinton , to serve as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Forget for the moment that we are supposed to take the word of a man who had his license to practice law suspended (and brother does he ever need the practice) because of admitted wrong practices and giving a false statement in a deposition (Perjury) during the Paula Jones sexual harassment trial?. Was his answer dependent on the definition of "what" "were" and the phrase "talking about" like he said what the "meaning of 'is' is" when asked about his sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky? Are we also supposed to ignore the fact that the FBI is also investigating the Clinton Foundation, and both Bill and Hillary's roles in any "quid pro quo" (or if you prefer "pay for play") process attached to donations?

So both Bill and Loretta knowingly violated prosecutorial ethics by said meeting, even if by chance or accident. If you don't believe it, you only have to go to  the American Bar Association's Standards on Prosecutorial Investigations Standard 2.2 Selective Investigative Tecnique (f) and Bill Clinton is a witness in the Clinton Foundation investigation. Not only should Loretta Lynch have recused herself after such contact, she actually should have done it when the Clinton's were first under investigation due to her history with Bill. If she is going to accept the FBI's decision to indict, why did she not recuse? Her laughing admission (I didn't get the joke; did you?) that the "chance" meeting took place and her Clintonesk response that fully expects to take the FBI recommendation. Wiggle room if ever there was.

Lastly, I'd like to discuss all the talk about Hillary didn't know about this "chance" meeting and that she would be mad at Bill. What a crock of rotten Turkey dung. Do you honestly think Bill and Hillary don't know what each other are doing (politically speaking that is)? Do you honestly believe her Obama-like retort that she found out about it in the News? If you do, I have 60 acres of swampland in Florida that should interest you; no, it's not mine, but I've only sold it six or seven times.

Friday, July 1, 2016

Cummunism in our Government

Our government is riddled with Communists. Most of these purveyors of Socialism call themselves Progressives, with the notable exception of Van Jones who openly admits he's a Communist Revolutionary and explains Progressivism without naming it. Make no mistake Progressivism is Communism and all Communists are Socialists but not all Socialists are Communists (prime example being Fascism which is not Communist but is  Socialist)  True Progressivism is just the implementation of Communism a little bit at a time. Glenn Beck defines the difference between the two as being an "R"; Communism is Revolution and Progressivism is Evolution.

Another tidbit of knowledge you should keep in mind is that the Communists don't identify themselves as Communists or Socialists (too much of a stigma attached to these terms), so in the past they called themselves Progressives. However, when the meaning of that term because too obvious to people, they dropped it and used the "Liberal" label instead. They were not true Liberals but they cloaked themselves in that term and they looked upon true Liberals  as "useful idiots". Once they turned the Liberal label toxic, they reverted back to the term "Progressive".

Another issue we have with the current administration is the number of Muslims pervading our government, the worst case is the main advisor (puppeteer is a better term) to Barack Hussein Obama, Valerie Jarrett. You wonder why the Iran deal was so bad? Look no further than to this woman's country of birth, Iran.  I know this post is about Communists in our government, but the Communists and the Extremist Muslim Fanatics   , although they don't really get along as the Chechens in Russia demonstrate, they will unite to achieve a shared goal of destroying the United States of America. Then and only then will they fight each other for supremacy and the winner will not be relevant to Americans as either one will rule with an iron hand over a Democratic Republic which will no longer exist. When push comes to shove, Barack Obama, Van Jones and Loretta Lynch need to be very wary as many Muslims(especially extremists) believe Muhammad was a white man who owned black slaves.

Returning to the original discussion of Communism in our Government, we need to ensure that "We The People" regain the reins of governance and kick out all those who pose a danger to our Republic This would include more "useful idiots" that have not been discussed as of yet; Those in our Federal Government that do not care about the people or states they are to represent; they only care about power, control and money they command.  They also don't care about their own political parties as long as the status quo can be maintained.

What relay pulls my chain is this Anti-Trump movement being waged by members of the GOP! What they hell are they thinking? Apparently only about their own situations. These "Traitors" apparently don't give a damn about Kill...I mean Hillary Clinton winning this election. OK, so maybe we don't know what we'll get from Donald Trump but you sure as hell know what you'll get from that woman; more of the same as we've been getting since Obama's swearing into office in 2009. She proudly proclaims that she is a progressive woman and we all know what that means.

We must make sure this Communist woman does not get control of our country. All Conservatives must get behind and support Donald Trump. He won the nomination fair and square; he also pledged, as did all his sixteen of his GOP opponents, to support the eventual winner. What happened to that pledge? All I can say we must replace those hypocrites who pressed so hard to get Mr. Trump's pledge and now that Trump has won, have gone back on their word. Mr. Trump was not my first choice; not even second or third, but now that he's won, I support him whole-heartily. No wonder Congress has such a poor approval rating from our citizenship; we are tired of lying, cheating, hypocritical, self-centered crooks who only strive to see what they can get, or get away with, as government officials. We need better non-legislating Supreme Court Justices as well and if Clinton becomes Potus we'll have more radicals legislating from lifetime appointments. We'll lose our Constitution completely as well as all of our true liberties.

Thursday, June 23, 2016

24 Islamic Terrorist Attacks and Counting

Under the Obama and Clinton Administration we have suffered from 24 Islamic Terrorist attacks. Going back to Bill Clinton that number increases by even the 911 attacks ( read this ) Remember, 911 took years to plan and George Bush was sworn in late due to recount demanded by Al Gore.

Hillary Clinton is like having Bill on steroids (as far as foreign policy) is concerned. She shares Commissar Obama's view that Assault Weapons should be banned, at least for American patriots. Both are too stupid to realize two vary important items concerning the AR-15 weapon used by Omar Mateen:
  1. It is NOT an assault rifle since true assault rifles have a selective fire switch. (The gun grabber Progressive made up their own definition just so they could ban more guns. Under their definition: semi-automatic with a removable magazine, a Ruger 10/22 is an Assault weapon.) A true Assault rifle also needs to fire an intermediate rifle cartridge (NOT a .22 LR which is also a pistol cartridge).
  2. The Libiots (Liberal plus Idiots equal Libiots) claim Mateen purchased an Assault Rifle LEGALLY. That is only due to the Gun Grabber's agenda. If a woman claims spousal abuse, the accused (on the accuser's word alone) has any firearms confiscated and cannot legally purchase a firearm (violating about half of our Bill of Rights). So, why is it that someone being watched or investigated  by Any government agency i.e.: FBI, NSA, Military Intelligence, Homeland Security etc., is not awarded the same benefits as a spousal abuser?
Not only are we now allowing 10,000 Syrian refugees to enter the US with no way to effectively vet these people, but Hillary Clinton wants to increase that number to 65,000. I guess she's not satisfied with only four patriot's blood on her hands, she's striving to increase that number. Using her "The ends justify the means" logic, if Americans die (no matter the number), it'll be a good thing if she can advance her gun grabbing agenda. Make no mistake friends, all Obama has done and what Clinton wants to continue have nothing to do with protecting citizens of the USA. They are both ideologues with two main goals in position of Potus:
  1. Abolish all guns and all portions of the Constitution they vehemently oppose such as the second amendment; the first amendment as it applies to we peons; the tenth amendment etc.
  2. Retain Democratic control of our government since only radical progressives now run that party to which I used to belong (no conservatives or plain liberals wanted or allowed).
I'll end with this statement of Charlie Rangel (D,NY) that proves the arrogance and designs of Democrats when it comes to firearms. Looks like they treat the second amendment like the first...That is you can say it if they agree with you, otherwise es ist verboten!

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Issues 2016 Candidates must Address

8 Issues to Address for 2016 Election

  • Restore America's Place in the World
  • "Entitlements"
  • Decrease the size of Federal Government
  • Restoration of the Constitution
  • Establish Term Limits
  • Improve Citizen Protection
  • Remove Obstacles to Business growth
  • Call it what it is
The above eight issues should be addressed by ALL candidates vying to become Potus in the 2016 Presidential Election. I did not number them as all are important and should be addressed as soon as possible, some possibly simultaneously. I will define these issues as I listed them above for simplicity not out of importance. It should be noted many of these issues may be addressed by solutions for other issues.

  • Restore America's Place in the World:
America has fallen from it's place as the most respected, listened to, trustworthy and feared Country in the world.  The only way to restore America's place in the world is to remove the Progressives. Islamic Radicals, Useful Idiots and restore our Military to it's rightful strength. It is important to know that military strength is not necessarily for waging war but it IS a deterrent to hostile, war-like actions as those taken by Russia against Ukraine; N Korea against S Korea etc. Do you actually believe Russia would have invaded the Ukraine if Barack Obama hadn't announced plans to remove missiles from Europe or that our A-10 wart hog (which the Russian military being tank heavy deeply fears) would be removed from production? Do you honestly believe ANY Middle Eastern country would worry about American intervention when Obama issued how many red lines crossed warnings to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad without EVER doing ANYTHING? What kind of faith does this install in our Allies in the region? Or anyplace else in the world for that matter?
  • "Entitlements":
Once and for all we need to set the record straight on the issue of what is an entitlement? Progressives in fact all politicians love to group Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare payments and Food Stamps all together. In fact only Medicare and Social Security are entitlements for those who paid into them. Why, because they did pay for it therefore they are entitled to receive it. All the rest are strictly handouts that no one is entitled to receive no matter what Politians may say. What's worse is the people entitled to received Social Security are the only ones entitled to receive Medicaid because they also paid into it. Furthermore, all the BS concerning the Social Security Trust Fund running out of money is due more to politicians changing the rules and borrowing from it. A drawer full of IOU's doesn't pay the bills. Being the brainchild of another progressive, FDR, it was mandatory for most poor slobs like me; didn't factor in inflation and wasn't meant for survivor benefits, just payees.
  • Decrease the size of Federal Government:
Our Founding Fathers had endured massive sized governments in Europe and were vehemently opposed to creating such humongous governing bodies here. That is one thing that our glorious "Constitutional Lawyer" of a Potus has correctly identified...The Constitution is based on Limiting the size and scope of the Federal government . How does a "Living Document" intend to interpret this? No change required thank you. Not even with the passage of Millenniums changes this purpose and scope. The larger a Federal Government grows, the less empowered are its people and the citizens should rule not by an oligarchy of self-centered, corrupt and greedy power mongers we currently endure. How many czars do we now have? How many illegal SWAT Teams? How many organizations that were only to advise that now have total control, like the EPA, which was not supposed to have any power to enforce or make laws, yet has its own SWAT Team? Why? The only logical explanation is Obama's stated wish to have his own civilian force as well armed and trained as the Military which progressives have been chipping away at for decades. Mussolini did this so did Hitler and Stalin and all other paranoid Socialists in the past. Hey, it worked for them; why not for Obama?
  • Restore our Constitution:
Why you mean you ask me? Our Constitution is OK. No friends, it's been perverted down through the years by Socialist, Progressive, Communist (whatever you choose to call them) enemies of the United States.  The Constitution is not a "living" document to be interrupted any way some activist judge wants. It says what it means and means what it says. Nowhere within its framing will you find the term "separation of church and state". Activist jurors who love to exceed their authority and basically legislate from the bench have decided this is to be the law of the land. It needs to be pointed out that not even the Supreme Court is allowed to defy the Constitution by enacting law. Neither they nor the President have that authority. It is strictly the job of Congress to enact legislation and therefore, any law enacted by the Scotus or Potus is unjust and is NOT the "Law of the Land". And using Federal authority to regulate interstate commerce does not include  our government's broadened, "out of scope" use to force Citizens to purchase a commodity as it did with Obamacare.
  • Establish term limits:
All branches of our Federal government need to have term limits applied, not solely the Presidency. I would suggest two terms for Senators which corresponds to a twelve year limit. Applying that logic to the House of Representatives would mean a six term limit or twelve years. The Supreme Court Judges should not be for life, but rather for a term of twelve years. That way activist and Ideologue judges would have to answer for their actions at some point in time. Finally, I see no reason to change the current term limit for the Potus. Too many terms seem to inspire delusions of grandeur as was evident with FDR and therefore the reason for establishing limits in the first place.
  • Improve citizen security:
I placed this security issue here, not for lack of importance but due to the fact it required prior bullets to be in place beforehand. Next we require border security. No country today has an open border policy except for The United States under our present administration. Progressives in our country are running rampant. Why such a push to foster policies so detrimental to America's Security? Well, there are many reasons. First let's examine those that are shared by the useful idiots in the Democratic party. Not necessarily those, like Barak Obama, who wish to destroy The United States or in his terms "Fundamentally transform" America. Those motive are really just one...And that is to ensure that the Democratic party rules the USA Ad Infinitum. Both parties would love that situation, but unfortunately, Liberals seem to adhere to the core philosophy of the Progressives, to wit: "The ends justifies the means".  This includes padding the voting rolls with illegals and ensuring no action be taken that would identify illegal voting which also includes the dead and multiple votes. Therefore, the Democrats vehemently oppose any kind of voter vetting so they can lock in all the illegal votes garnered by loose immigration policy. Unfortunately, this immigration policy or lack thereof, also fits into the plans of Ideologues, like Obama and Clinton, who actually WANT harm, via gun violence, to befall our nation to abet their Gun Grabbing agenda. Obama wants the UN small arms treaty to supersede our Second Amendment effectively neutering this part of our Constitution. Of course, this would have no affect on Criminals or Islamic Terrorists (remember harshest gun control lawed nations France and Belgium?). We need the following:
  1. Secure the borders (stop paying to return Illegals home)
  2. Re-open Ellis Island and install similar points country wide
  3. Enforce Immigration Laws
  4. Remove Unconstitutional "Sanctuary Cities" status
    • Fines (Communities and Ruling Officials)
    • Jailing of ruling officials
    • Removal of ALL Federal monies
  5. RE-establish Immigration rules covering Quotas and bans on certain countries
  6. Increase the number of Border Control agents
  7. Re-establish ICE enforcement which HAD been working
  8. Empower border community law enforcement to assist border agents
  9. Imprison Repeat offenders (using money saved by NOT paying to return Illegals)
  • Remove Obstacles to business growth
One of our problems today is the subject being touted by Donald Trump and that is the benefit companies receive from moving their operations (and OUR jobs) outside the USA. These include, but not limited to:
  • Lower wages
  • More favorable tax structures
  • No import tax liability (tariffs)
  • Monetary exchange rates
Another huge problem we have under the Obama Administration are the myriad of regulations thrust upon our Small Businesses which, as often quoted by Obama, are the backbone of our jobs growth, hinder and in some cases actually stop small business growth. Read this article posted by US News & World Report about the Obama Regulations.
Also killing Business growth in our nation are actions taken by the EPA to placate Militant Environmentalists without regard to the human suffering it may cause. I specifically refer to the draught in California exponentially increased due to protection afforded the small Delta Smelt. The original issue concerned the filters used when the water was turned on for farming had mesh comprised of openings that were too large for these fish entrapping them and as a result were killing or maiming a protected species. The EPA's solution was to turn off the water to the San Joaquin Valley reverting it back to the dessert it was prior to irrigation putting farms and farm workers out of business in the "Breadbasket" of America. That situation still exists today without any attempt to develop a better filter curing the original problem without the harm caused to the millions of Americans affected by this mismanagement of the situation by the EPA and consequently Obama's administration
  • Finally let's identify the existing situation by name
The current administration as well as Mrs Clinton refuse to name Radical Islamic Terrorists as a problem facing the very existence of our beloved (or is that beleaguered) country. Even the Department of Homeland Security is not allowed to use that phrase. You know, the same organization that classified our returning Veteran Heroes as Terrorists? The same department that classifies Tea Party Patriots as Terrorists?  The same department that views proponents of the Second Amendment as Terrorists?  And yet they won't identify Radical Islamists as Terrorists? The same radical group that vows and strives for America's destruction aren't Terrorists? What a crock of Horse dung. We didn't call Hitler or Mussolini an overseas contingency problem did we? No we called them what they were, fascists and not even our enemies called us Racists for that. I wonder why this administration, Hillary Clinton and the Democrats are so focused on Gun Control when Barack Obama insisted that Global Warming was the biggest threat we faced today? Where were all the filibusters by the Democrats to get Republicans to enact legislation to prevent Global Warming? None to be found because Global Warming is nothing but smoke and mirrors. Did man cause the last Great Ice Age? No, in fact Man did not cause any of the ice ages as they were all due to cyclic Earth weather conditions. Obama, his minions and Hillary Clinton all refuse to identify this issue for what it is because that does NOT fit their false narrative that Gun Control is the answer. End of rant
***NOTE*** I started writing this rant when there were 17 candidates running for the GOP nomination. I was just now able to complete it.

Saturday, June 18, 2016

Notice for all Gun Control FREAKS

This is directed towards Barrack Obama, Hillary Clinton and the rest of you Second Amendment abolisher supporters no matter what political affiliation to which you claim to adhere. Why did our Founders place such importance on our right to keep and bear arms? First amendment rights cannot be guaranteed without it. The Revolution, as we know it, could not have taken place without private ownership of firearms. This right was not allowed in Europe for the common man. Only the aristocrats and nobility were accorded such gun ownership. Just in case you forgot what the exact wording of the amendment, I will re-publish it here in its entirety, to wit:

Amendment II.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

That's it folks. I guess I missed the part about it pertaining ONLY to hunting. The "Militia" was NOT the armed forces. Nor was it the National Guard (which did not even exist back then and since our current armed forces have been so brutally reduced in size by the same politicians who now want to disarm US citizens, has been used to augment the armed forces to the nth degree). Just in case you are one of those who say this amendment was only meant for hunting or military, how about these from our founding fathers?

Just for sh**s and giggles, the fallowing prove how F***ed up our current administration is as well as past gun control advocates:

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun.   The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”
– Mao Tze Tung, Nov 6, 1938

Now listen to Anita Dunn say one of her favorite political philosophers is Mao Tse Tung who killed more people than either Hitler or Stalin:

Now let's get back to our Fraud-in-chief's attack on the Second Amendment. Of course he is not alone. All the Progressive A-Holes as Killary Clinton, Harry "The Rat" Reid, Chuck "The Weasel" Schumer, Nancy "The Queen" Pelosi, Lizzie "Pocahontas" Warren Barbara "The Armed" Boxer et all back our so called Commander-in-Chief.  One thing all of this Scum have in common:  Armed Secret Service protection. How about removing that protection before we discuss dis-arming the American Citizen? How about retrieving all the guns (especially those pesky Fully automatic firearms) sent to Mexico by Fast & Furious before any talk of more Gun Laws. How about telling DHS director, Jeh Johnson, to do the job his department was created to do instead of kissing Obama's Socialistic ASS? What was that you say? To foster cooperation between Federal agencies. The FBI should have told DHS about the Mateen issue and they in turn should have notified the ATF to block all gun purchases by this demon. Forget this crap about the no fly list, this would have been easier and cleaner. Of course Jerk-O Obama has made sure none of our Government agencies work properly. Which is NOT  incompetence but by plan. Everything he's done has been to make us unsafe as possible. He wants gun killings to occur so he can keep hammering on gun control. Remember, as one of his closest advisors and friend Bill "The Weatherman Killer" Ayers was quoted by the FBI as saying 25 million American who could NOT be indoctrinated would be eliminated. This is the same "The ends justify the means"  philosophy which Obama follows. Two more points and then I'll I'll wrap up this rant...
  1. Apparently, none of these ignoramuses have considered the fact that some of the toughest gun laws in the world exist in France and Belgium but these laws did NOT protect these countries from Radical Islam Terrorist shootings.
  2. I didn't know that guns were causing Climate Change. They must be or Obama wouldn't be so fixated on guns and rather would be fixated on Climate Change prevention since his assertion that this is the greatest danger we face.

Der Führer  has over 70 Illegal Government S.W.A.T. Teams Are these really needed? Why does the EPA need a SWAT Team except to do the Führer 's bidding. The only question is are these Brown Shirts or SS troops?  I'll wrap it up with this online story about Gun Control... Socialist Gun Laws

Do you know who made this statement?

This guy: